From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lange v. Commissioner of Patents

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 16, 1972
352 F. Supp. 116 (D.D.C. 1972)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 604-72.

December 16, 1972.

Paul M. Craig, Jr., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

S. William Cochran, Solicitor, U.S. Patent Office, for defendant.


Memorandum Opinion and Order


The Commissioner of Patents, the defendant in this civil action arising under 35 U.S.C. § 145, has filed objections to plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for admission by the defendant. They were filed August 16, 1972 and the objections on November 22, 1972.

Plaintiff seeks mostly information on matters pertaining exclusively to the internal management and operation of the Patent Office, and the qualification of its officers in a certain, specific, professional field.

Assuming arguendo permissibility of such requests, the Court finds such to be irrelevant in a proceeding under § 145. Specifically, and further, it suffices to say that any inquiry in the nature of a challenge to the scientific and professional qualifications of the Examiners-in-Chief cannot be entertained, since a fortiori they are "persons of competent legal knowledge and scientific ability" ( 35 U.S.C. § 7), who have been " appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate," ( 35 U.S.C. § 3) [emphasis supplied], and perform quasi-judicial functions, as do all other Examiners.

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain v. Brenner, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 223, 386 F.2d 985 (1967).

Therefore, any attempted probing by way of interrogatories and requests for admission into their mental processes and expertise or the lack of it in the making of rulings or arriving at conclusions is not open as an avenue of discovery, since theirs, in the circumstances, as has been stated, is an adjudicatory function. Since this is a proceeding de novo, the Court is concerned only with the findings and conclusions of the Patent Office and any new evidence which may be presented at the trial of the cause. The objections, therefore, to interrogatories and requests for admission, in the circumstances, are sustained, and this memorandum may be regarded as an order to that effect.

United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 61 S.Ct. 999, 85 L.Ed. 1429 (1941).


Summaries of

Lange v. Commissioner of Patents

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 16, 1972
352 F. Supp. 116 (D.D.C. 1972)
Case details for

Lange v. Commissioner of Patents

Case Details

Full title:Emil LANGE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 16, 1972

Citations

352 F. Supp. 116 (D.D.C. 1972)

Citing Cases

In re Nilssen

Nilssen's argument that the board's decision is invalid by reason of the members' lack of competency in the…