From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lang v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One
Sep 15, 1978
571 S.W.2d 449 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 39468.

July 18, 1978. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied September 15, 1978.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J.

Paul E. Corning, Jr., Clayton, for movant-appellant.

John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Paul Robert Otto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Movant has appealed the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion whereby he challenged a 15-year sentence, imposed on his 1974 guilty plea. He contended he had been promised a three-year sentence. This is clearly refuted by the guilty plea proceeding, and the trial court so found.

Our review of the record shows the trial court's judgment is not clearly erroneous, that no error of law appears, and that a full opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

SMITH and McMILLIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lang v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One
Sep 15, 1978
571 S.W.2d 449 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Lang v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS P. LANG, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One

Date published: Sep 15, 1978

Citations

571 S.W.2d 449 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. State

No error of law appears, and a full opinion would have no precedential value. Lang v. State, 571 S.W.2d 449…