From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Prator

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Sep 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2114-P (W.D. La. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2114-P

09-20-2012

JAMIE LANE v. STEVE PRATOR, ET AL.


JUDGE STAGG


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Plaintiff and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 20 day of September 2012.

_____________

TOM STAGG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lane v. Prator

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Sep 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2114-P (W.D. La. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Lane v. Prator

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE LANE v. STEVE PRATOR, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2114-P (W.D. La. Sep. 20, 2012)