From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire
Mar 5, 1907
66 A. 101 (N.H. 1907)

Opinion

Decided March 5, 1907.

APPEAL, by citizens and taxpayers of Keene, from the laying out of a highway by the mayor and aldermen, and BILL IN EQUITY, brought by the city and a landowner interested in the laying out, praying that the appeal be dismissed and the appellants enjoined from its further prosecution. At a hearing before Peaslee, J., at the October term, 1906, of the superior court, decree was ordered for the city, and the appellants excepted.

Joseph Madden, for Elisha F. Lane and others.

Cain Benton, for Helen R. Colony.

John E. Allen, for the city of Keene.


In the absence of a demurrer to the bill in equity, the only question raised by the exception to the decree for the city is as to the right of citizens and taxpayers of the city to appeal from the laying out of a highway by the mayor and board of aldermen, which was determined adversely to the right in Bennett v. Tuftonborough, 72 N.H. 63.

Exception overruled.


Summaries of

Lane v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire
Mar 5, 1907
66 A. 101 (N.H. 1907)
Case details for

Lane v. Keene

Case Details

Full title:LANE a., Ap'ts, v. KEENE. KEENE a. v. LANE a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire

Date published: Mar 5, 1907

Citations

66 A. 101 (N.H. 1907)
66 A. 101

Citing Cases

Worthen v. Kingsbury

" Burnham v. Goffstown, 50 N.H. 560, 562, 563. Apparently, the same theory was applied in Andover School…

Blanchard v. Railroad

" Bennett v. Tuftonborough, 72 N.H. 63, 64. The earlier cases are there collected. The rule was reaffirmed in…