From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 5, 2015
577 U.S. 802 (2015)

Summary

holding that there was no fatal variance where the State presented evidence indicating that the defendant stole the property identified in the indictment but also presented circumstantial evidence indicating that the defendant stole other property not identified in the indictment

Summary of this case from Scott v. State

Opinion

No. 14–10065.

10-05-2015

Anthony LANE, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further consideration in light of Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1986, 188 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2014).


Summaries of

Lane v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 5, 2015
577 U.S. 802 (2015)

holding that there was no fatal variance where the State presented evidence indicating that the defendant stole the property identified in the indictment but also presented circumstantial evidence indicating that the defendant stole other property not identified in the indictment

Summary of this case from Scott v. State
Case details for

Lane v. Alabama

Case Details

Full title:Anthony LANE, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 5, 2015

Citations

577 U.S. 802 (2015)
136 S. Ct. 91
193 L. Ed. 2d 7

Citing Cases

Ex parte Lane

On October 5, 2015, the United States Supreme Court granted Lane's petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated…

Lane v. State

" Lane v. Alabama, 577 U.S. ––––, ––––, 136 S. Ct. 91, 193 L.Ed.2d 7 (2015).…