From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landry v. Hoepfner

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 9, 1987
822 F.2d 510 (5th Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-3784.

July 9, 1987.

Mark McTernan, McTernan, Parr Rumage, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.

Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Research Appeals, Gretna, La., for respondents-appellees.

Rene I. Salomon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Da's.

E. Pete Adams, Executive Director, La. Dist. Attys. Assoc., Inc., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Exec. Dir. La. Da's Assoc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Patrick E. Carr, District Judge.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Landry v. Hoepfner

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 9, 1987
822 F.2d 510 (5th Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Landry v. Hoepfner

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP LANDRY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JUDGE J. ROBERT HOEPFNER AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 1987

Citations

822 F.2d 510 (5th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Landry v. Hoepfner

Rehearing En Banc Granted July 9, 1987. See 822 F.2d 510. Mark McTernan, McTernan, Parr Rumage, New Orleans,…