From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamoureux v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Oct 29, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-176 (D. Vt. Oct. 29, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-176

10-29-2020

Nicholas Lamoureux, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER
(Doc. 23)

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 23), the Commissioner's Response to the Motion (Doc. 24), and Plaintiff's Reply to the Response (Doc. 25), the Court finds that the Motion was timely filed on October 7, 2020, given both Plaintiff's counsel's actual receipt of the Notice of Award on September 25, 2020 and the presumptive receipt of the Notice on September 24, 2020. (See Doc. 23 at 3, Doc. 23-2 at 1, Doc. 25 at 1.) See Sinkler v. Berryhill, 932 F.3d 83, 89 (2d Cir. 2019) (holding that motions for attorney fees under § 406(b) are "subject to the fourteen-day filing limitation of Rule 54(d)(2)(B) [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] once a party receives notice of a benefits calculation following a sentence four remand judgment"); id. at 88 ("Once counsel receives notice of the benefits award[,] . . . there is no sound reason not to apply Rule 54(2)(B)'s fourteen-day limitations period to a § 406(b) filing." (emphasis added)); id. at 89 n.5 ("Nothing in this opinion departs from the law's presumption that a party receives communications three days after mailing." (emphasis added) (citing Tiberio v. Allergy Asthma Immunology of Rochester, 664 F.3d 35, 37 (2d Cir. 2011))); compare 20 C.F.R. § 404.1703; Viator v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., Case # 15-CV-6658-FPG, 2019 WL 1252964, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2019) ("It is presumed that a recipient of a mailed communication from the [Social Security Administration] received it within five days of the date on the notice." (emphasis added)). Upon reviewing the Motion and its attachments, the Court also finds that the requested fee amount of $14,172—which is not greater than 25% of Plaintiff's past due benefits—is reasonable, representative of the results achieved, and does not amount to a windfall. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002); Wells v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367, 372 (2d Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall confer and submit for the Court's consideration a proposed order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 23) and awarding fees to Plaintiff's attorney in the amount of $14,172 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 29th day of October 2020.

/s/ John M. Conroy

John M. Conroy

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Lamoureux v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Oct 29, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-176 (D. Vt. Oct. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Lamoureux v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Nicholas Lamoureux, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: Oct 29, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-176 (D. Vt. Oct. 29, 2020)