Lamb v. Unknown

Full title: MIKE LAMB, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 9, 2015

2:15-cv-1400 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2015)

Opinion

MIKE LAMB, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-1400 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 9, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         On July 28, 2015, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a complaint in this action and to submit either the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was informed that failure to comply with this order would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) The thirty-day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. As plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge for all purposes in this action (ECF No. 3), the undersigned will dismiss this action without prejudice.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.