From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamage v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 5, 2001
285 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: July 5, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Edwin Lamage, Attica, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and, Mugglin, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

The misbehavior report charging petitioner with fighting, violent conduct and refusing a direct order was sufficiently detailed to give petitioner adequate notice of the charges and to permit him to prepare a defense (see, Matter of Green v. Senkowski, 276 A.D.2d 1006). In addition, the misbehavior report and testimony of its author provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of the charges (see, Matter of Rossi v. Portuondo, 277 A.D.2d 615,lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 706 [Feb. 20, 2001]), and petitioner's contrary version of the incident created a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Arias v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 807). Although the Hearing Officer had no obligation to call witnesses not requested by petitioner (see, Matter of Faison v. Stinson, 221 A.D.2d 746), he nevertheless had the authority to do so (see, e.g., Matter of Collazo v. Coombe, 235 A.D.2d 654; Matter of Lindsay v. Coughlin, 211 A.D.2d 920), particularly where, as here, the author of the misbehavior report was called to provide further details of the incident after petitioner questioned the sufficiency of the report. Petitioner's remaining claims, including Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and are without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Lamage v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 5, 2001
285 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Lamage v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWIN LAMAGE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 5, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Tumminia v. Goord

The record also discloses that, despite petitioner's continuing repetition of arguments and demands…

Smith v. Goord

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author, provide substantial evidence…