From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamage v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 5, 2010
76 A.D.3d 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 508611.

August 5, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Edwin Lamage, Ossining, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating two prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Medina v Selsky, 28 AD3d 898, 898; Matter of Basden v Goord, 19 AD3d 838, 839).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with a refund of the mandatory surcharge in the amount of $5.


Summaries of

Lamage v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 5, 2010
76 A.D.3d 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Lamage v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWIN LAMAGE, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 5, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6336
905 N.Y.S.2d 522

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Fischer

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determinations have been administratively reversed and…