From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mo Wan Lam v. Dai Sing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-08977

Submitted October 2, 2002.

January 21, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated September 5, 2001, which granted the plaintiff's motion to restore the action.

Jaffe Nohavicka, New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin and David Allweiss of counsel), for appellants.

Caesar Napoli, New York, N.Y. (J. Sean Connelly of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court should not have marked the case "off" the calendar based upon the plaintiff's failure to attend a compliance conference since CPLR 3404 should not be applied to pre-note of issue cases (see Wasliewicz v. Village of Monroe Police Dept., 288 A.D.2d 377; Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 A.D.2d 190). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion to restore the action.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mo Wan Lam v. Dai Sing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Mo Wan Lam v. Dai Sing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MO WAN LAM, respondent, v. DAI SING CORPORATION, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 856

Citing Cases

Millien v. Millar Elevator Industries, Inc.

It is undisputed that no note of issue placing this action on the trial calendar was ever filed, and the…