Summary
holding that a plaintiff's motion to strike the defendant's motion for summary judgment was improper
Summary of this case from Alyshah v. U.S.Opinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Lakosh's request for oral argument is denied. We also deny Loakosh's motion for sanctions on appeal.
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, D.C. No. CV-88-00075-JKS; James K. Singleton, District Judge, Presiding.
D.Alaska
AFFIRMED.
Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.
Thomas A. Lakosh appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging violations of 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 and 411. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.