From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laime v. American Standard

Workers' Compensation Commission
Feb 6, 1991
914 CRD 2 (Conn. Work Comp. 1991)

Opinion

CASE NO. 914 CRD-2-89-9

FEBRUARY 6, 1991

The claimant was represented by Carl D. Anderson, Esq.

The respondents were not represented in these proceedings as the instant appeal concerned matters between the claimant and the Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund.

The Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund was represented by Michael J. Belzer, Esq., Assistant Attorney General.

This Petition for Review from the August 30, 1989 Supplemental Finding and Award of the Commissioner at Large acting for the Second District was heard August 10, 1990 before a Compensation Review Division panel consisting of the Commission Chairman, John Arcudi, and Commissioners Gerald Kolinsky and Angelo dos Santos.


OPINION


Respondent Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund appeals the August 30, 1989 Supplemental Finding and Award, because that decision awarded claimant Sec. 31-308a benefits after an informal hearing.

The appeal is on both statutory, and constitutional procedural due process grounds. Sec. 31-298 defining the conduct of hearings requires that certified copies of testimony be available for the parties. There was no recorded testimony at the informal hearing here. Sec. 31-301(a) C.G.S. provides "The Compensation Review Division shall hear the appeal on the record of the hearing before the commissioner. . . ." Without such a record before us, we are powerless to determine the correctness of the trial commissioner's decision.

Section 31-298 provides: In all cases and hearings under the provisions of this chapter, the commissioner shall proceed, so far as possible, in accordance with the rules of equity. He shall not be bound by the ordinary common law or statutory rules of evidence or procedure, but shall make inquiry in such manner, through oral testimony or written and printed records, as is best calculated to ascertain the substantial rights of the parties and carry out justly the spirit of this chapter.

Without such a record below we have no basis for review. We, therefore, remand the instant matter for further proceedings.

Commissioners Gerald Kolinsky and Angelo dos Santos concur.


Summaries of

Laime v. American Standard

Workers' Compensation Commission
Feb 6, 1991
914 CRD 2 (Conn. Work Comp. 1991)
Case details for

Laime v. American Standard

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE LAIME, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE vs. AMERICAN STANDARD, EMPLOYER and…

Court:Workers' Compensation Commission

Date published: Feb 6, 1991

Citations

914 CRD 2 (Conn. Work Comp. 1991)

Citing Cases

Warchola v. U.S. Gypsum Specialists

Since there is no record of the proceedings before the trial commissioner, the Compensation Review Board…

Vasseur v. Konica Business Machines

Since there is no written or printed record of the proceedings before the trial commissioner and no Finding…