From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lagmay v. Nobriga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Apr 6, 2017
CIV. NO. 16-00408 DKW/KJM (D. Haw. Apr. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CIV. NO. 16-00408 DKW/KJM

04-06-2017

HENRY LAGMAY, #AO191119, Plaintiff, v. SHELLY NOBRIGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS

Plaintiff's April 5, 2017 "Objections" are construed as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's March 21, 2017 Order striking the proposed Second Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 26; Local Rule LR60.1. Three grounds justify reconsideration: (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Hele Ku KB, LLC v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 873 F. Supp. 2d 1268, 1289 (D. Haw. 2012); Grandinetti v. Hyun, 2017 WL 239741, at *2 (D. Haw. Jan. 19, 2017).

Plaintiff claims "Bias-PreJudice-Preconception-Favoritism-Discrimination," and "Indifference." Mot., ECF No. 26. He objects to the dismissal of Defendants "who acquiesces in Illegal Behavior which could be regulated by contract," and alleges an implied conspiracy. Plaintiff cites Phillips v. Hust, 338 F. Supp.2d 1148 (D. Ore. 2004), a decision that was vacated by the Supreme Court, 555 U.S. 1150 (2009), and to two of his own cases that were dismissed for failure to state a claim and later affirmed by the Ninth Circuit. See ECF No. 26, PageID #645-46 (citing App. Nos.15-17068 and 16-1586).

Plaintiff cites no new law or evidence, nor details circumstances justifying the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. See White v. Sabatino, 424 F.Supp.2d 1271, 1274 (D. Haw. 2006). Plaintiff therefore fails to persuade the Court to reconsider its decision to strike the Second Amended Complaint for failure to comply with the Court's explicit directions, and his Objections are DENIED and OVERRULED.

Plaintiff is again reminded that it is his responsibility to ensure that Defendants Kaipo Sarkissian and Levy Christensen are served within the time /// /// /// allotted for service by FRCP 4(m), as calculated from the February 9, 2017 Service Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 6, 2017 at Honolulu, Hawai'i.

/s/ Derrick K. Watson

Derrick K. Watson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lagmay v. Nobriga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Apr 6, 2017
CIV. NO. 16-00408 DKW/KJM (D. Haw. Apr. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Lagmay v. Nobriga

Case Details

Full title:HENRY LAGMAY, #AO191119, Plaintiff, v. SHELLY NOBRIGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Apr 6, 2017

Citations

CIV. NO. 16-00408 DKW/KJM (D. Haw. Apr. 6, 2017)