From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lafond v. City of Kankakee

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Feb 8, 2010
Case No. 09-CV-2222 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 8, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 09-CV-2222.

February 8, 2010


ORDER


A Report and Recommendation (#17) was filed by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal in the above cause on December 7, 2009. On December 17, 2009, Defendants City of Kankakee and Melvina Calvin filed their Objection to Report and Recommendation (#18). Following this court's careful de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's reasoning and Defendants' Objection, this court agrees with and accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#17). This court agrees that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#4) should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (#17) is accepted by this court.

(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (#1) remains in the complaint. Count IV is dismissed without prejudice and Plaintiff is allowed fourteen (14) days to amend the claim. Counts V and VI are dismissed with prejudice.

(3) This case is referred to Judge Bernthal for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Lafond v. City of Kankakee

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Feb 8, 2010
Case No. 09-CV-2222 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Lafond v. City of Kankakee

Case Details

Full title:DAVID G. LAFOND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KANKAKEE, and Illinois municipal…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2010

Citations

Case No. 09-CV-2222 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Love v. City of Chi.

"[A] claim based on failure to train does not always ‘implicate the structural adequacy of police protection…

Hobart v. City of Stafford

source of pre-discovery evidence that he may produce to support such a claim. After its review of the…