Opinion
2013-08-22
In the Matter of Dagan LACORTE, Appellant, v. Howard L. CYTRYN, et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)
Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP, New York City (Jerry H. Goldfeder of counsel), for appellant. Alan Goldston, Scarsdale, for Howard L. Cytryn and others, respondents.
Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP, New York City (Jerry H. Goldfeder of counsel), for appellant. Alan Goldston, Scarsdale, for Howard L. Cytryn and others, respondents.
Jeffrey J. Fortunato, County Attorney, New City (Thomas M. Mascola of counsel), for Rockland County Board of Elections, respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the board petitioner claimed were erroneous ( see Matter of Krueger v. Richards, 59 N.Y.2d 680, 682, 463 N.Y.S.2d 413, 450 N.E.2d 219 [1983] ). Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.