From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Labow v. Labow

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport
Jul 27, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 7031 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Opinion

No. CV82-210394S

July 27, 1994


MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO AMEND


The defendant moves to amend her counterclaim by adding a claim for vexatious litigation. The defendant alleges that the claims in the plaintiff's complaint have been terminated in her favor and that the plaintiff had no probable cause to bring the claims. The plaintiff objects to the amendment.

"It is within the discretion of the trial court to grant or deny an amendment. . . ." LoSacco v. Young, 20 Conn. App. 6, 18. Without ruling on the merits of the claim for vexatious litigation, the court believes the better procedure is to allow the amendment at this time, subject to the plaintiff's right to attack it. As in most cases, the court feels that this is better accomplished by a proper hearing on a motion to strike fully briefed by both parties, than on a motion to amend.

Accordingly, the motion to amend is granted without prejudice to the filing of an appropriate motion to test it.

SAMUEL S. FREEDMAN, JUDGE


Summaries of

Labow v. Labow

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport
Jul 27, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 7031 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)
Case details for

Labow v. Labow

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LABOW vs. MYRNA LABOW

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport

Date published: Jul 27, 1994

Citations

1994 Ct. Sup. 7031 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Citing Cases

Labow v. Labow

In November, 2002, the plaintiff brought the present action, pursuant to the accidental failure of suit…