From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LA VIN v. LA VIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1952
279 App. Div. 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

February 18, 1952.


In a stockholder's action plaintiff appeals from an order which opened the default of defendant Sanford Hotel Corporation, directed the service of a copy of the amended complaint on it, and permitted it to answer said complaint within twenty days. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. Since respondent's default was deliberate and intentional, and there was no adequate showing of a meritorious defense, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant the motion. ( Colonial Fuel Corp. v. Kahn, 214 App. Div. 83; Booraem v. Gibbons, 263 App. Div. 665; Scordo v. Terrell, 275 App. Div. 940; Chaplin v. Selznick, 186 Misc. 66, 68-69.) Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LA VIN v. LA VIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1952
279 App. Div. 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

LA VIN v. LA VIN

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN R. LA VIN, Appellant, v. RUSSELL C. LA VIN et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 18, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Matter of Golenbock

The reasons advanced for the failure to answer are quite unimpressive, and would not be regarded as excusable…

Heller v. Ward

The facts stated in the moving papers are insufficient to show that the respondents' default was due to…