From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veglia v. Guidice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1951
278 App. Div. 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

February 19, 1951.

Present — Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.; Nolan, P.J., not voting.


In an action to recover damages based upon fraudulent representations in connection with the purchase of a business, its fixtures and equipment, judgment in plaintiff's favor, after trial by the court, without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion the proof sustains the finding that the loss of the business so purchased was the result of appellants' misrepresentations and that respondent is entitled to recover the prospective profits thereof during the remainder of the term of the lease which appellants sold to him. ( Snow v. Pulitzer, 142 N.Y. 263; Bagley v. Smith, 10 N.Y. 489; Schile v. Brokhahus, 80 N.Y. 614.)


Summaries of

Veglia v. Guidice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1951
278 App. Div. 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Veglia v. Guidice

Case Details

Full title:SABINO J. LA VEGLIA, Respondent, v. ROSE GUIDICE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Rennie v. Pierce Cards, Ltd.

The court awarded plaintiff the nominal sum of $100 for lost profits, but plaintiff, having elected to…