Opinion
November 13, 1984
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.).
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with Special Term's holding that as trial counsel to the codefendant law firm and plaintiff, defendant Sallah continued in his responsibilities as an attorney in the underlying action until the action terminated in final judgment (see Siegel v Kranis, 29 A.D.2d 477, 489; cf. Marabello v City of New York, 99 A.D.2d 133, 139-140; La Bay v White Plains Hosp., 97 A.D.2d 432). The Statute of Limitations was tolled until that time. Lazer, J.P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.