From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kyle v. Dzurenda

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 15, 2019
No. 75560-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 75560-COA

02-15-2019

NOLAN KYLE, Appellant, v. JAMES DZURENDA, DIRECTOR; NDOC; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Nolan Kyle appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g). --------

In his November 21, 2017, petition, Kyle first claimed the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) improperly declined to apply his statutory credits toward his parole eligibility date. The district court concluded Kyle was serving concurrent terms for convictions of possession of document or personal identifying information and robbery, and committed those offenses in 2016 and 2017. The district court further found Kyle's parole eligibility date was "based on the sentence which requires the longest period before [Kyle] is eligible for parole," NRS 213.1213(1), and for that reason, Kyle's parole eligibility date was controlled by his robbery sentence because it contained the longest minimum term. See NRS 200.380(2); NRS 205.465(2). Accordingly, Kyle was not entitled to relief because his controlling sentence was for a category B felony, committed after the effective date of NRS 209.4465(8), and for those reasons, Kyle was not entitled to application of credits toward his minimum parole eligibility date. Given these circumstances, we conclude the district court did not err by denying this claim.

Second, Kyle appeared to claim the application of NRS 209.4465(8) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. However, because Kyle committed his crime after NRS 209.4465(8) became effective in 2007, his claim was without merit. See Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 28-29 (1981). Therefore, the district court did not err by denying the petition, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, A.C.J.

Douglas

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge

Nolan Kyle

Attorney General/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Kyle v. Dzurenda

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 15, 2019
No. 75560-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Kyle v. Dzurenda

Case Details

Full title:NOLAN KYLE, Appellant, v. JAMES DZURENDA, DIRECTOR; NDOC; AND THE STATE OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 15, 2019

Citations

No. 75560-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 15, 2019)