From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payment v. Roiko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Aug 10, 2015
CASE NO. C14-5633 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2015)

Summary

discussing PREA complaints

Summary of this case from Alverto v. Henderling

Opinion

CASE NO. C14-5633 BHS

08-10-2015

KYLE LEE PAYMENT, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL ROIKO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 21. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED; and

(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 14) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice.

Dated this 10th day August, 2015.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Payment v. Roiko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Aug 10, 2015
CASE NO. C14-5633 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2015)

discussing PREA complaints

Summary of this case from Alverto v. Henderling
Case details for

Payment v. Roiko

Case Details

Full title:KYLE LEE PAYMENT, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL ROIKO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Aug 10, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. C14-5633 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Alverto v. Henderling

The filing of an inmate grievance, including a complaint made under the PREA, is protected conduct. Aholelei…