Kyger v. State

Full title: SCOTT WILLIAM KYGER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Eugene

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

Civil No. 07-481-TC (D. Or. Dec. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-481-TC.

December 30, 2010

ORDER

MICHAEL HOGAN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 10, 2010. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified, School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principlesde novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation. Defendants' second motion for summary judgment (#77) is allowed. This action is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 30th day of December, 2010.