From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuperman v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Dept. of Corrections

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 29, 2005
Civil No. 05-cv-185-PB (D.N.H. Jul. 29, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-cv-185-PB.

July 29, 2005


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


As noted in my Report and Recommendation on the request for preliminary injunction, I noted that plaintiff had not exhausted his administrative remedies. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) "(n)o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 . . ., or any other Federal law, by a prisoner . . . until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted." The current version of Section 1997e(a) stripped the district courts of discretion and exhaustion is now mandatory.See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 739 (2001). Plaintiff's motions to amend and to submit evidence demonstrate further that exhaustion did not precede the suit and that it must be dismissed without prejudice to refile after exhaustion of all plaintiff's claims.

I recommend that the suit be dismissed without prejudice and that upon refiling any further filing fee be waived.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).


Summaries of

Kuperman v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Dept. of Corrections

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 29, 2005
Civil No. 05-cv-185-PB (D.N.H. Jul. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Kuperman v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Dept. of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:Albert A. Kuperman v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jul 29, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 05-cv-185-PB (D.N.H. Jul. 29, 2005)