From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kukic v. Melecio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 25, 2023
22 CIVIL 2684 (CM)(SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

22 CIVIL 2684 (CM)(SDA) 22 CIVIL 9075 (CM)(SDA)

09-25-2023

Dilber Kukic, Petitioner, v. Phil Melecio, Respondent. Maria Hrynenko, Petitioner, v. Emily Williams, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo Endorsed Order dated September 25, 2023, having reviewed the objections to the learned Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court concludes they are entirely lacking in merit and the Court has rejected them. The Report is adopted as the opinion of the Court-is amply supported by the law and the record. Accordingly, the petitions are DENIED, and these cases are dismissed. The Court notes that the challenge to removal of the juror is ABANDONED. The petition presents no issue of constitutional significance so no certificate of appealability shall issue. An appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Kukic v. Melecio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 25, 2023
22 CIVIL 2684 (CM)(SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Kukic v. Melecio

Case Details

Full title:Dilber Kukic, Petitioner, v. Phil Melecio, Respondent. Maria Hrynenko…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

22 CIVIL 2684 (CM)(SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2023)

Citing Cases

Marte v. Thoms

(“An allegation of improper discharge of a juror is generally an issue of state law not cognizable on habeas…