From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuehner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2010
2:09cv749 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)

Opinion

2:09cv749 Electronic Filing.

June 1, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The above captioned case was initiated on June 11, 2009, by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Document No. 1) accompanied by a Complaint. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Document No. 30), filed on May 7, 2010, recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 19) be granted. Plaintiff filed Objections on May 17, 2010 (Document No. 32). After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 19) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 30) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated May 7, 2010, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if he so desires.


Summaries of

Kuehner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2010
2:09cv749 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Kuehner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:TERRY KUEHNER, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BOARD OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

2:09cv749 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Walsh

429 U.S. at 88 n. 9)). An inmate also has no liberty interest in being released on parole. Kuehner v.…