From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Dec 8, 1969
107 N.J. Super. 510 (App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

Argued November 24, 1969 —

Decided December 8, 1969.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Hudson County.

Reported at 103 N.J. Super. 525 ( Ch. Div. 1968).

Mr. John P. Doran argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. James F. McGovern, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Leon Miroff argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Hyman Tobin, on the brief).

Mr. Allan Maitlin argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Feuerstein, Sach Maitlin, attorneys).


Concord Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, adjudicating that its purported cancellation of a liability policy issued to plaintiff was void and unenforceable and further declaring that the policy in question was in full force and effect on February 27, 1967, the date on which plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident.

We have reviewed the voluminous record and conclude that the judgment should be affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial judge in his opinion which is reported at 103 N.J. Super. 525.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Dec 8, 1969
107 N.J. Super. 510 (App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KUBECK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CONCORD INSURANCE COMPANY, A…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Dec 8, 1969

Citations

107 N.J. Super. 510 (App. Div. 1969)
259 A.2d 473

Citing Cases

Weathers v. Hartford Insurance Group

The purpose of N.J.S.A. 17:22-6.2a is to protect the insurance-buying public "from the misappropriation,…

Sheeran v. Sitren

The underlying purpose of the statute is to protect the insurance-buying public from any misappropriations,…