From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kroog v. Ray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1976
52 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 3, 1976


In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 26, 1975, which dismissed the complaint at the close of plaintiff's offer of proof, at the opening of the trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Trial Term properly dismissed the complaint on the authority of Stahli v McGlynn ( 47 A.D.2d 238). Plaintiff erroneously contends that defendant's intentional leaving of the accident scene distinguishes Stahli. The fact that the operator of the other vehicle left the accident scene creates no exception to the rule that there is no recovery for "emotional distress [and ensuing injury following] awareness of * * * damage to one's property" (p 240). Gulotta, P.J., Hopkins, Latham, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kroog v. Ray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1976
52 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Kroog v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:EDNA M. KROOG, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of GEORGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)