From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kron v. Hanover Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1964)

Summary

applying literal compliance rule to bar coverage where insured breached warranty that gasoline would not be kept aboard tug

Summary of this case from Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Aarvik

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1964

Decided October 15, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE A. ARKWRIGHT, J.

Vincent A. Catoggio, Edmund F. Lamb and William E. Fay, III, for appellant.

John C. Hart for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Kron v. Hanover Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1964)

applying literal compliance rule to bar coverage where insured breached warranty that gasoline would not be kept aboard tug

Summary of this case from Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Aarvik

applying literal compliance rule to bar coverage where insured breached warranty that gasoline would not be kept aboard tug

Summary of this case from Great Lakes Reinsurance
Case details for

Kron v. Hanover Fire Insurance

Case Details

Full title:SIVERT J. KRON, Appellant, v. HANOVER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1964

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1964)
254 N.Y.S.2d 119
202 N.E.2d 563

Citing Cases

Great Lakes Reinsurance

See Jarvis Towing & Transp. Corp. v. Aetna Ins. Co., 298 N.Y. 280, 82 N.E.2d 577, 577 (N.Y. 1948) (no…

Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Aarvik

See Jarvis Towing & Transp. Corp. v. Aetna Ins. Co., 298 N.Y. 280, 82 N.E.2d 577, 577 (1948) (no coverage due…