Opinion
2019–01809
05-29-2019
In the Matter of Michael KRICHEVSKY, Petitioner, v. Noach DEAR, etc., et al., Respondents.
Michael Krichevsky, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Noach Dear.
Michael Krichevsky, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Noach Dear.
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.
DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition, in effect, to prohibit the enforcement of an order of the respondent Noach Dear, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 12, 2018, entered in an action entitled U.S. Bank National Association v Krichevsky, commenced in that court under Index No. 506127/16, and for declaratory relief, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569, 528 N.Y.S.2d 21, 523 N.E.2d 297 ; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352, 509 N.Y.S.2d 493, 502 N.E.2d 170 ). The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. In addition, the petitioner cannot seek declaratory relief in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see CPLR 3017 ).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., AUSTIN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.