From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kreiser Construction v. Trafford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 11, 1997
699 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2293

Opinion filed June 11, 1997. Rehearing Denied October 8, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, David L. Tobin, Judge.

Kohl, Metzger, Spotts, Ponsoldt Tapper (Stuart), for appellant.

Behar, Gutt Glazer, for appellees.

Before JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.


We find no error in the trial court striking pleadings for failure of a party to secure new counsel after original counsel withdrew. Commonwealth Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 630 (Fla. 1990).

We do find error (which was conceded by the appellee) in the trial court, non-jury, fixing the amount of damages after a default was entered and a jury trial had been demanded. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.430; Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1980);Ulrich v. Berton, 661 So.2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Therefore, the final judgment is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for a jury trial on the amount of damages with proper notice accorded to all parties.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Kreiser Construction v. Trafford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 11, 1997
699 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Kreiser Construction v. Trafford

Case Details

Full title:KREISER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND MICHAEL SCHNEIDER, APPELLANT, vs. HARRY M…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 11, 1997

Citations

699 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Wolfe v. Smilack

The trial court erred in conducting a non-jury trial even after striking appellants' pleadings because the…

Wolfe v. Smilack

The trial court erred in conducting a non-jury trial even after striking appellants' pleadings because the…