Kravitz v. Rabsatt

Full title: JAY KRAVITZ, Petitioner, v. CALVIN RABSATT, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 28, 2014

9:12-CV-719 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2014)

Opinion

9:12-CV-719 (DNH/RFT)

08-28-2014

JAY KRAVITZ, Petitioner, v. CALVIN RABSATT, Respondent.

APPEARANCES: JAY KRAVITZ Petitioner, Pro Se P.O. Box 206 Earlton, NY 12058 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Respondent 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 OF COUNSEL: PRISCILLA I. STEWARD, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General

DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge

APPEARANCES: JAY KRAVITZ
Petitioner, Pro Se
P.O. Box 206
Earlton, NY 12058
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Respondent
120 Broadway
New York, NY 10271
OF COUNSEL: PRISCILLA I. STEWARD, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Pro se petitioner Jay Kravitz brought this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 30, 2014, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that the petition be denied. Petitioner timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which petitioner objected, the Report-Recommendation is adopted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Rule 10, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED; and

2. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United State District Judge
Dated: August 28, 2014

Utica, New York.