From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kratche v. New York Central Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Judgment and order reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The trial court erred in admitting the testimony of the witness Molloy, over objection and exception of the plaintiff, with respect to tests or observations made by that witness under conditions dissimilar to those prevailing at the time of the accident. ( Green v. Long Island Railroad Co., 131 App. Div. 277; Parker v. Erie Railroad Company, 153 id. 938; Bretsch v. Plate, 82 id. 399.) The defendant's alleged negligence in the operation of its train in other respects is to be determined in the light of the ordinance which disabled defendant from having recourse to the locomotive whistle to warn wayfarers. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Locomotive Whistles Ordinance, City of Newburgh, November 14-21, 1888 — [REP.


Summaries of

Kratche v. New York Central Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Kratche v. New York Central Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:ANNA McCAFFREY KRATCHE, as Administratrix, etc., of EDWARD MOORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

People v. Acevedo

juries can themselves form perceptions through the direct use of their own senses (4 Wigmore, Evidence [3d…