From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KRAM v. ADLER

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 10, 1925
126 Misc. 179 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)

Opinion

December 10, 1925.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Samuel M. Rivelson, for the appellant.

Saul Grover Wlodaver, for the respondent.


Plaintiff issued a requisition in replevin which, with the summons and complaint in the appropriate action were served upon defendant by a marshal. The marshal's return shows, and the testimony demonstrates, that the chattels mentioned in the requisition had been leased to a third party.

Under those circumstances defendant could not have been guilty of contempt of court for having "wilfully disobeyed the writ of replevin * * * in that he failed to turn over [to the marshal] * * * the chattels therein described and enumerated."

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, BIJUR, LEVY and CHURCHILL, JJ.


Summaries of

KRAM v. ADLER

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 10, 1925
126 Misc. 179 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
Case details for

KRAM v. ADLER

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN KRAM, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of KAY TRIMMING…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1925

Citations

126 Misc. 179 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
212 N.Y.S. 727

Citing Cases

Walters v. Reinhoudt

One may not be punished as for contempt for failure to do the impossible. ( Kram v. Adler, 126 Misc. 179;…