From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kracht v. Town of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 15, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Christine M. Zoldak, who lived in a trailer park owned by the defendant Candlestick Associates, L.P., and managed by the defendant John Warner, complained to police officers of the defendant Town of Newburgh Police Department that the plaintiff was trespassing on her property and the trailer park property. Shortly thereafter, while he was visiting with other tenants of the trailer park, the plaintiff was arrested for trespassing. The charge was later dismissed and the plaintiff then brought this action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest and unlawful imprisonment.

A cause of action to recover damages for false arrest does not lie if the defendant can establish the existence of probable cause for the plaintiff's arrest ( see, Broughton v. State of New York, 37 N.Y.2d 451, cert denied sub nom. Schanbarger v. Kellogg, 423 U.S. 929; see also, Lui Yi v. City of New York, 227 A.D.2d 453). In support of its cross motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for false arrest, the defendant Town of Newburgh presented evidence that its police officers were told by the defendant Christine M. Zoldak that the plaintiff was trespassing on the trailer park property and that she had the authority to sign a complaint against the plaintiff. She signed a complaint and the plaintiff was arrested shortly thereafter on the trailer park property.

The officers were entitled to rely upon the information provided by Zoldak ( see, Minott v. City of New York, 203 A.D.2d 265, 267), and, upon seeing the plaintiff on the property, had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff ( see, CPL 140.10 [a]; see also, People v. Campbell, 215 A.D.2d 120, affd 87 N.Y.2d 855). Since the evidence was sufficient to conclusively establish probable cause for the plaintiff's arrest, the court properly granted the motion of the defendant Town of Newburgh for partial summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for false arrest.

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kracht v. Town of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1997
245 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Kracht v. Town of Newburgh

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW KRACHT, Appellant, v. TOWN OF NEWBURGH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 197

Citing Cases

Zwecker v. Clinch

In support of their motions, they established, prima facie, that the police had probable cause to arrest the…

Wyllie v. District Attorney, Co., Kings

The municipal defendants met their burden of demonstrating entitlement to summary judgment on the first…