In Kozak, it was undisputed that the defendant had limited financial resources and that he did not have significant financial resources derived from recent employment to permit his travel to New York for a deposition.
Summary of this case from H2 Architect, P.C. v. StevensonJuly 7, 2005.
Disclosure — Examination before Trial — Defendant in breach of alleged oral contract action ordered to be available for deposition by video conference.
In Kozak, it was undisputed that the defendant had limited financial resources and that he did not have significant financial resources derived from recent employment to permit his travel to New York for a deposition.
Summary of this case from H2 Architect, P.C. v. StevensonFull title:KOZAK v. MARSHALL
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 7, 2005
v St. Luke's Hosp. Ctr., 109 AD2d 694, 695, 486 NYS2d 737 [1 Dept 1985]; cf. Hoffman v Kraus, 260 AD2d 435,…
In re SinghConsequently, a party's unilateral request to conduct a deposition by electronic means will be denied where…