From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kowalczyk v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, A. P. J., WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The complaint, wherein plaintiffs alleged that David E. Kowalczyk (plaintiff) was improperly terminated from his position in violation of his rights pursuant to the Civil Service Law, presents "'the classic formulation of an article 78 proceeding'" ( Broderick v. Board of Educ., 253 A.D.2d 836, 837, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 802, quoting Foster v. City of New York, 157 A.D.2d 516, 518; Vanmaenen v. Hewlett-Woodmere Pub. Schools, 226 A.D.2d 151; Conklin v. Town of Ramapo, 214 A.D.2d 639, 640-641). This action, commenced more than four months after the termination of plaintiff's employment, is time-barred ( see, Broderick v. Board of Educ., supra, at 837; CPLR 217).


Summaries of

Kowalczyk v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Kowalczyk v. Ricci

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. KOWALCZYK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFF, v. LOUIS M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 773

Citing Cases

Padiyar v. Albert Einstein Coll. of Med. of Yeshiva

Defendants' primary argument is that the instant action should have been brought as an Article 78…

Matter of Rodriguez v. City of Yonkers

"[T]he gravamen of the [petitioner's] claim, that he was fired by the city without notice of the charges, a…