From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koutnik v. Berge

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
May 6, 2004
03-C-345-C (W.D. Wis. May. 6, 2004)

Opinion

03-C-345-C

May 6, 2004


ORDER


Plaintiff has moved to strike defendants' expert witness report and disallow the testimony of defendants' expert, Kurt A. Linjer. I understand plaintiff to be asking that the court disregard the facts defendants proposed in support of their motion for summary judgment that cite to Linjer's affidavit testimony.

I will reserve a decision on plaintiff's motion to strike until the time I decide defendants' motion for summary judgment. When he files his response to defendants' proposed findings of fact, plaintiff may object to each fact defendants propose in reliance on Linjer's testimony. However, to be on the safe side in the event plaintiff's motion to strike is denied, plaintiff should also respond to the proposed fact as though the testimony will be allowed, either disputing the fact with factual evidence of his own or admitting the fact as undisputed.

IT IS ORDERED that a decision is STAYED on plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' expert witness report and disallow the testimony of defendants' expert, Kurt A. Linjer, until such time as the court rules on defendants' motion for summary judgment.


Summaries of

Koutnik v. Berge

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
May 6, 2004
03-C-345-C (W.D. Wis. May. 6, 2004)
Case details for

Koutnik v. Berge

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. KOUTNIK, Plaintiff, v. GERALD BERGE, JON E. LITSCHER, CAPTAIN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: May 6, 2004

Citations

03-C-345-C (W.D. Wis. May. 6, 2004)