From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kosiur v. Standard-North Buffalo Foundries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1938
255 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

November 16, 1938.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.


Order modified by striking out the third ordering paragraph and by amending the second ordering paragraph by striking out the words "and it is further" and by inserting in place thereof "such inspection and survey and the taking of pictures to be made on the same occasion at a time to be agreed upon between the parties or in case of failure to agree, by the order of the Special Term," and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The third paragraph is stricken out because it does not seek to discover facts but merely names of possible witnesses and this we deny in our discretion. ( Gavin v. New York Contracting Co., 122 App. Div. 643; Nocito v. Acierno, Id. 45.) All concur. (The order grants a motion to examine party before trial.)


Summaries of

Kosiur v. Standard-North Buffalo Foundries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1938
255 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Kosiur v. Standard-North Buffalo Foundries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AGNES KOSIUR, as Administratrix, etc., of MICKEL KOSIUR, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Wollen v. Dewitt, Inc.

The Fourth Department has held that a party will not generally be compelled to disclose names of witnesses at…

Rios v. Donovan

As to item 10 — the inquiry regarding the names of witnesses — it should be pointed out that until recently,…