Kornafel v. U.S. Postal Serv.

Full title: STANLEY E. KORNAFEL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2020

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-4503 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 5, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-4503

10-05-2020

STANLEY E. KORNAFEL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants.

C. DARNELL JONES, II, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5^th day of October 2020, upon consideration of Plaintiff Stanley E. Kornafel's Response to Show Cause Order (ECF No. 5), and for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. Kornafel is ENJOINED from filing any civil actions concerning the identical, untimely allegations he has raised in this case as well as Kornafel v. U.S. Postal Serv., Civ. A. No. 19-2292 (E.D. Pa.); Kornafel v. U.S. Postal Serv., Civ. A. No. 99-6416 (E.D. Pa.); Kornafel v. United States, Civ. A. No. 00-3250 (E.D. Pa.); Kornafel v. U.S. Government, Civ. A. No. 96-7436 (E.D. Pa.); and Kornafel v. U.S. Government, Civ. A. No. 95-6670 (E.D. Pa.); namely that the litigation and settlement of a March 11, 1992 motor vehicle accident involving a postal service vehicle resulted in an abuse of process, deceit, bias, and other irregularities.

2. The Clerk of Court SHALL NOT DOCKET any new case filed by Kornafel that raises any claims covered by this injunction.

3. If Kornafel submits any new cases to this Court that are covered by this injunction, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return those papers to Kornafel along with a copy of this Order. If Kornafel submits a new Complaint that is only partially covered by this injunction, the Clerk of Court SHALL return the filing to Kornafel without docketing it. In such a case, Kornafel may resubmit the filing for docketing so long as it only raises claims that are not covered by this injunction.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ C. Darnell Jones , II

C. DARNELL JONES, II, J.