From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Konigsberg v. Time, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 7, 1968
288 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

68 Civ. 3142.

August 7, 1968.

Nathan Kestnbaum, New York City, for plaintiff.

Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, by Alan J. Hruska, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.


OPINION


Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant from publishing magazine articles which allegedly libel the plaintiff and the August 9, 1968 issue of Life Magazine in particular which contains an article entitled "The Mob: The Congressman and the Hoodlum" and which contains statements regarding the plaintiff which, if false, would constitute libel.

A court of equity will not, except in special circumstances, issue an injunctive order restraining libel or slander or otherwise restricting free speech.

To enjoin any publication, no matter how libelous, would be repugnant to the First Amendment to the Constitution, Crosby v. Bradstreet Co., 312 F.2d 483 (2d Cir. 1963); Parker v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 320 F.2d 937 (2d Cir. 1963); cf. Near v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 51 S.Ct. 625, 75 L.Ed. 1357 (1931), and to historic principles of equity. American Malting Co. v. Keitel, 209 F. 351 (C.C.A. 2, 1913).

The motion for an injunction is therefore denied.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Konigsberg v. Time, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 7, 1968
288 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Konigsberg v. Time, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Harold KONIGSBERG, Plaintiff, v. TIME, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 7, 1968

Citations

288 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)

Citing Cases

Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc.

dard level required in paragraph 3 immediately above. 6. The fundamental law of libel in both Oklahoma and…

Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

Generally, the First Amendment prohibits prior restraint through injunction, and torts against the person…