From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Komsa v. Colonial Penn Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 10, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Alexander A. Delle Cese, J.H.O., Alan J. Saks, J.


Within half an hour of an alleged hit-and-run accident in which the plaintiff was struck by a 1971 Chevolet Monte Carlo, a police accident report was filed describing, inter alia, the approximate color and the license plate number of the Gonzalez vehicle. Although the eyewitness to the incident was not identified and the reporting police officer did not appear at the subsequent hearing, counsel consented to the entry into evidence of the report. In the absence of timely objection, the evidence is presumed to have been unobjectionable and any error considered waived. (See, CPLR 4017; Horton v Smith, 51 N.Y.2d 798, 799; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 4017.05.) Further, the totality of the evidence adduced at the hearing supports the Hearing Officer's findings.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Komsa v. Colonial Penn Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Komsa v. Colonial Penn Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:STELLA KOMSA, Respondent, v. COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY, c/o MATERIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 36

Citing Cases

Woodcock v. Welt

That said, "[i]t is well established that ‘an order from a Support Magistrate is final and Family Court's…

Simon v. Indursky

Nor was it improper for the court to allow plaintiff to call Dr. Chesner as a witness despite the omission…