In Kohl v. Kohl, 6 Misc.3d 1009(A), 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51759(U), *24, 2004 WL 3106725 (Sup.Ct., N.Y. County 2004), affd. 24 A.D.3d 219, 806 N.Y.S.2d 35 (1st Dept.2005), the wife sought an unequal distribution of the marital estate based on the husband's criminal conviction.
Summary of this case from Linda G. v. James G.October 20, 2004.
Husband and Wife Equitable Distribution.
In Kohl v. Kohl, 6 Misc.3d 1009(A), 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51759(U), *24, 2004 WL 3106725 (Sup.Ct., N.Y. County 2004), affd. 24 A.D.3d 219, 806 N.Y.S.2d 35 (1st Dept.2005), the wife sought an unequal distribution of the marital estate based on the husband's criminal conviction.
Summary of this case from Linda G. v. James G.In Kohl, the court found that the husband should be responsible for 65% of the legal fees for civil forfeiture proceedings and the wife responsible for 35% (2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51759[U], *30).
Summary of this case from Linda G. v. James G.Full title:Kohl v. Kohl
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Date published: Oct 20, 2004
There is nothing in the law that even suggests that equitable distribution awards are somehow inviolate and…
S.H. v. E.S.There is nothing in the law that even suggests that equitable distribution awards are somehow inviolate and…