From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koehler v. Saltzman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1939
4 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued October 18th, 1938.

Decided February 6th, 1939.

On appeal from an interlocutory order of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Davis.

Mr. George H. Jacobs ( Mr. William J. Shepp, of counsel), for the defendants-appellants.

Messrs. Riggins Davis, for the complainant-respondent.


We have examined and considered with care the pleadings and evidence as exhibited by the state of the case, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and conclude that the order from which the appeal is taken was fully justified, and such order will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Koehler v. Saltzman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1939
4 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Koehler v. Saltzman

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT J. KOEHLER, complainant-respondent, v. GERTRUDE R. SALTZMAN et…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 1939

Citations

4 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1939)
4 A.2d 509

Citing Cases

Bolte v. Rainville

Its jurisdiction is grounded in and limited by well-established principles. 10. Lane v. Rushmore, 123 N.J.…