From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koch v. Bilich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 1994
200 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In or about December 1985, the plaintiff Walton Koch sold his equity interest in the M.C. Machine and Tool Corporation back to the corporation for a purchase price of $86,200. Pursuant to the terms of a "buy-sell" agreement which was drafted by the defendant Charles A. Bilich, the corporation delivered certain promissory notes payable to the order of the plaintiff. The notes were personally guaranteed by two individual shareholders of the corporation, but no other provision was made to secure payment of the amounts owed to the plaintiff. Additionally, no provision was made to absolve the plaintiff from certain corporate liabilities he had previously guaranteed. The corporation stopped making payments on the notes approximately five months after the agreement was executed.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against the corporation to recover on the notes, but the action was stayed by the corporation's filing of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. The plaintiffs obtained a judgment against the individuals who had guaranteed payment of the notes, but they could not collect because the two had filed for bankruptcy. The plaintiffs thereafter commenced this action for legal malpractice against the defendant Bilich and his law firm. The Supreme Court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment and this appeal ensued. We now affirm.

The record indicates that the defendants represented numerous parties with potentially conflicting interests in connection with the subject buy-sell agreement. Allegations that the defendants failed to properly advise the plaintiffs concerning the need to obtain security for payment of the amounts owed to them, as well as their continued responsibility for payment of certain corporate obligations, raise triable issues with respect to whether the defendants committed professional malpractice. Summary judgment was therefore properly denied. Thompson, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Koch v. Bilich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 1994
200 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Koch v. Bilich

Case Details

Full title:WALTON KOCH et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES A. BILICH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 74

Citing Cases

Kew Gardens Hills Apartment Owners, Inc. v. Horing Welikson & Rosen, P.C.

The HWR defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the legal…