From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knox v. Knox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1979
70 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

May 28, 1979


In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 21, 1977, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed her complaint seeking a divorce and alimony, granted defendant's counterclaim for divorce, awarded defendant exclusive possession of the marital residence and failed to direct an equal distribution of the proceeds of the former joint bank accounts. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, plaintiff is granted a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment (see Domestic Relations Law, § 170), and defendant's counterclaim is dismissed. The action is remitted to Special Term for a de novo determination as to the issues of alimony, possession of the marital residence and the proceeds of the former joint bank accounts. Special Term found that plaintiff's recurrent intoxication and abrogation of her household duties constituted cruel and inhuman treatment of defendant. However, defendant could show no physical injury to himself other than headaches and, as to these, there was no proof that plaintiff was the cause thereof other than defendant's self-diagnosis. This does not satisfy the rigid requirements for proving cruel and inhuman treatment (see Rios v. Rios, 34 A.D.2d 325, affd 29 N.Y.2d 840), especially in view of the higher standard of proof required when, as here, the parties have been married for many years (22) and a divorce entered against the wife would leave her unsupported and unable to support herself (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236; see, also, Hessen v. Hessen, 33 N.Y.2d 406; Filippi v. Filippi, 53 A.D.2d 658). Plaintiff, however, made out a sufficient case for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment of her by defendant, on the basis of two unprovoked physical attacks on her by defendant within one and one-half years (see Echevarria v. Echevarria, 40 N.Y.2d 262), and defendant's frequent violent outbursts precipitated by plaintiff's drinking habits. Damiani, J.P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Knox v. Knox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1979
70 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Knox v. Knox

Case Details

Full title:PAULA KNOX, Appellant, v. JOHN KNOX, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1979

Citations

70 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. Wilkins

In our view, the evidence fails to satisfactorily establish that plaintiff's physical or mental well-being…

Wald v. Wald

Plaintiff husband failed to supply the proof required for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman…