From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knickerbocker Properties, Inc. v. Razy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1994
202 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.).


Defendant's mistaken belief that he could avoid payment of the judgment to which he stipulated by declaring bankruptcy, when in fact as a resident alien he was not entitled to declare bankruptcy, will not justify setting aside the settlement (cf., Rivera v. State of New York, 115 A.D.2d 431, 432, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Knickerbocker Properties, Inc. v. Razy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1994
202 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Knickerbocker Properties, Inc. v. Razy

Case Details

Full title:KNICKERBOCKER PROPERTIES, INC., Respondent, v. HOMAYOUN RAZY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 10

Citing Cases

Weissman v. Weissman

The appeal from the QDRO must be dismissed since a QDRO is not appealable as of right, and we decline to…