From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knaus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 8, 1994
638 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-00589.

June 8, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Charlotte County, Lynn Gerald, Jr., J.

James Leray LeGrande of LeGrande LeGrande, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Knaus contends that the trial court erred in imposing costs of prosecution due the Charlotte County Sheriff's Office as restitution. We agree and therefore strike that portion of the restitution order.

Under section 775.089(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), the sheriff's office does not meet the definition of a victim. See Staudt v. State, 616 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Bain v. State, 559 So.2d 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Restitution order stricken in part; otherwise affirmed.

PATTERSON and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Knaus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 8, 1994
638 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Knaus v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MERLE KNAUS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 8, 1994

Citations

638 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. State

§ 775.089(1)(c). We do not decide in this case whether a government agency is a "person" for purposes of…

Seidman v. State

Seidman cites to cases that stand for the proposition that this state agency cannot be defined as a victim…