From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knapp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 16, 1979
370 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 78-1299.

April 10, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 16, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Alan R. Schwartz, J.

Brian R. McComb, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ.


Appellant was arrested and charged with violating two conditions of his probation. After a hearing the trial court revoked the probation and sentenced appellant to five years in the state prison.

Appellant urges reversal on the grounds that there was a violation of his due process rights in connection with his probation violation hearing. It is appellant's contention that he was not given proper and adequate notice of the hearing and that the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance thereby depriving appellant of an opportunity to produce witnesses and otherwise prepare a defense to the charges. We find merit in appellant's contention and reverse.

Reversed. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); Mato v. State, 278 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Hines v. State, 358 So.2d 183 (Fla. 1978).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Knapp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 16, 1979
370 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Knapp v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ENRIQUE KNAPP, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 16, 1979

Citations

370 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. Ward

Parties in a civil matter are not always entitled to a hearing; rather, they must be given an opportunity to…