From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knapp v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Apr 5, 2022
CA 21-0394-MU (S.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

CA 21-0394-MU

04-05-2022

CHANNING R. KNAPP, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.


JUDGMENT

P. BRADLEY MURRAY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991), for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the Plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993), and terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this matter.


Summaries of

Knapp v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Apr 5, 2022
CA 21-0394-MU (S.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Knapp v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:CHANNING R. KNAPP, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

CA 21-0394-MU (S.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2022)

Citing Cases

Horton v. Kijakazi

Id. at *9. See also Roussin v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2:20-CV-905, 2021 WL 6205948, at *19 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 16,…